Post by minervaPost by RobertVAPost by minervaPost by ZorkComcast in FL tells me that in '09 I will have to change the
physical cable in the house to have its system work. Of course
they will do that for megabucks. Is this true and if so, can
I just change the cable myself ? What about all the cable that
runs through the walls, etc ? ?
Thanks
Zork
Comcast customer service varies depending on whom you talk with. The
answer you got does not seem correct. Here is what is happening, by
law and by regulation by the FCC, by Feb. of 2009, all the telecasters
must change their signals from analog to digital. If you noticed,
comcast has been moving those channels that have changed their signal
up to their digital system. Most people who bought their sets a while
ago have analog televisions with analog tuners unless they purchased
one recently. To get the television channels after they move to
digital system, comcast will give you, (and you can get it now) a
digital cable converter box that gives you those channels only. This
is not the same as the full digital channels that are on a higher
paying scale. These are the digital channels that are moving from
analog to digital. The box should cost you nothing. For this, you
should not have to rewire your home. These boxes are programmed only
to pick up the channels that are moving from analog to digital, and
after you arrange for one with the comcast customer service tech, you
can pick up the box at a nearby service store without having to have
them come out to install it unless you do not know how to do so.
Again, this should cost you nothing more. In order to find this out,
i had to keep calling them back many times until i got a customer
service rep who knew to give me a box and how to program it. Keep
calling back until you get the right answers. To understand what is
going to happen in 2009, go to the fcc sponsored website at
www.dtv.govand you can call the fcc at 1-888-call-fcc.
For people who do not use cable and get their signals over the air
from antennae - rabbit ears, they will need a converter box as well,
and starting now, can apply to the government for two coupons to use
to buy the converter boxes from a store. The National
Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has
responsibility for administering the coupon program. More information
can be found atwww.ntia.doc.gov/otiahome/dtv/dtvcoupon.html.
NO!!!
CABLE providers are NOT required to discontinue analog service in
February of 2009. The analog cutoff only applies to full power Over The
Air (OTA) broadcasters. That doesn't prevent cable operators from
shifting channels to digital tiers at THEIR OWN OPTION though. The shift
of channels to digital will encourage subscribers to pay additional fees
for the digital programming tiers.
Many late model televisions will have the ability to receive unencrypted
digital signals, primarily local OTA broadcasts and "public access"
channels, directly from the cable system (Look for "QAM" in the TV's
features). Cable operators will probably encrypt any out of town
channels. You will probably need to rent a converter (for several
dollars a month) or rental CableCard (a little less expensive, but
requires a special slot in the TV) to view encrypted channels. Program
guides, on demand and Pay Per View services usually require a converter,
as the release of newer generation CableCards has been delayed.
Depending on the signal strength entering your home and quantity of
splits the existing RG58 cable might need to be replaced with RG6 cable
to reduce signal loss. Splitters might need replacement with ones able
to handle higher RF frequencies. Any signal amplifiers might need
replacement with bi-directional ones (also with higher frequency
capabilities), as many digital converters (as well as cable computer
modems) need to send signals back to the cable company.
What you say may be true, but that is not what the comcast and the local
government regulator told me. When I complained about my favorite
channels disappearing up to the digital system, their excuse is that it
is due to the mandated change from analog to digital as mandated by fcc.
At first, I had to pay extra to get those few channels, but they came
with a large number of what is to me - almost worthless stuff, i
returned the converter cable box because I did not want or need all the
digital channels and I did not think I should have to pay to see
channels that were on the regular cable system. But I started calling
again when they took off the us senate and replaced it with baseball
whenever they wanted to, Eventually, I got someone at the cable company
who gave me a specially programmed digital converter so i could get
the few channels I wanted and at no extra cost above what I currently
pay them.
i may not know the technical wherewithal, but i did go to the fcc
website and get the information that i provide about the coupon program
for the ota people. all in all, it is especially annoying for the
government to have done this to the public. at a recent hearing
conducted by senator inouye, some public interest groups testified that
the public needs to be informed. It is unfortunate, if what you say is
the case, that people will have to have wiring replaced. I do not think
most of the public is aware of what these changes will mean for them.
Consider:
Cable companies need the cooperation of local governments (sometimes
with some state level control) to install cable or fiber across or
under streets and highways.
Cable companies usually offer channels in their basic tier allowing
local government greatly increased opportunity to distribute
"televised" council, board of supervisor and/or school board meetings.
Also often offer channels for government provided information and
announcements.
Cable subscribers usually consider switching to an antenna to watch
local broadcast stations inconvenient. While the local broadcasters
can demand carriage on cable systems for free, the subscriber demand
for the channels being on the cable system makes it possible for the
broadcaster to receive compensation, often in the form of programming
advertisements on cable only channels, for permitting the cable
companies to include their channel(s) on the cable system. These
program advertisements are presumed to produce at least some increase
in local channel viewership and related paid ad revenue. Some even
partner with the cable company to produce cable only 24/7 news and/or
weather channels which generates a venue for additional local business
advertisements.
Most local governments receive taxes on those monthly cable bills.
Higher monthly bills often mean higher tax revenue.
All this mutual back scratching puts increased revenue from rental
cable company converters to the the economic interest of local
government and broadcasters as well.
Many of those rental analog addressable converters are old enough the
cable company can no longer claim a depreciation expense on them (also
means they've probably collected enough rental revenue to pay for
them). The cable company hasn't got that expense to offset the monthly
rental fee any more. New rental converters mean a new period of
depreciation deductions for their income tax. Note that the initial
expense of purchasing the boxes (old or new) can't be used as a tax
deduction until the depreciation schedule allows it.
The same slice of over the air spectrum that can only carry one analog
program can carry multiple digital sub-channels. The same can probably
be said for the cable system. Conversion of analog channels to digital
service probably increases the quantity of channels the cable company
can offer.
Many new televisions have a digital version of "cable ready", so a
growing number of cable subscribers will be able to manage without
converter boxes IF they are willing to settle for the basic service
tier as their analog TVs fail and have to be replaced.
This isn't an endorsement, just a description of reality. I'm no
bigger fan of my growing monthly cable bill than anybody else.
Unfortunately there aren't that many interesting channels in the
typical basic programming tier.
BTW: converters for digital service are normally "addressable" anyway,
so it's not unusual for the cable company to be able to remotely
control which channels a particular converter receives. Once logged
into the cable company's computer system a company representative can
modify the channel lineup for any of the converters in a few seconds,
even if the converter is attached to the cable in the subscriber's
home.